Welcome toVigges Developer Community-Open, Learning,Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
817 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

closures - Python lambda's binding to local values

The following code spits out 1 twice, but I expect to see 0 and then 1.

def pv(v) :
  print v

x = []
for v in range(2):
  x.append(lambda : pv(v))

for xx in x:
  xx()

I expected python lambdas to bind to the reference a local variable is pointing to, behind the scenes. However that does not seem to be the case. I have encountered this problem in a large system where the lambda is doing modern C++'s equivalent of a bind ('boost::bind' for example) where in such case you would bind to a smart ptr or copy construct a copy for the lambda.

So, how do I bind a local variable to a lambda function and have it retain the correct reference when used? I'm quite gobsmacked with the behaviour since I would not expect this from a language with a garbage collector.

Question&Answers:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Change x.append(lambda : pv(v)) to x.append(lambda v=v: pv(v)).

You expect "python lambdas to bind to the reference a local variable is pointing to, behind the scene", but that is not how Python works. Python looks up the variable name at the time the function is called, not when it is created. Using a default argument works because default arguments are evaluated when the function is created, not when it is called.

This is not something special about lambdas. Consider:

x = "before foo defined"
def foo():
    print x
x = "after foo was defined"
foo()

prints

after foo was defined

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome to Vigges Developer Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...